3.3. Two components of METAPHYSICUM
и     There is a difference, however, between these two "exits out of limits": reality В₁ of concrete-sensual image T' of object T exceeds the PHYSICUM P bounds, while reality В₂ of abstract/generalized thought T'' about object T, remaining within the МЕТАPHYSICUM В scope (not being a part of PHYSICUM), exceeds the reality В₁ bounds, and is already МЕТА-МЕТАPHYSICUM В₂.
   Further in the text the matter (continuum/hypersubstance) of an image В₁ will be named as astral one or merely as astralum В_А (or merely А); В₂ – as mental one or as mentalum В_M (or merely М).
   The fact that В_M  is a reality not only essentially, qualitatively different, but also independent from В_А, is proved in particular by the facts that
• an abstract object can serve for an operator as a marker of his patient, for example - a name of the patient; ; in this case the diagnosis is fulfilled without a concrete definition of an image of the patient (portrait features, a timbre of his voice etc), and
• the result (for example at definition of BP) can be received at once in the numerical (abstract-ideal), the mentalum form, without analog (concrete-image) representation (of BP magnitude), i.e. not as an act of abstraction from some concrete/astral image, but immediately, and hence, this mentalum object

exists independently on astralum    A perception image T' of an object T is a result of (direct) reflection of the first order Rd (fig. 2 and 3) and, hence, concerns to the continuum ВА, to the astralum (it has the astralum nature), as well as astralum (attributive) component TА of an object T which is named further as its astralum body..    Mentalum М is richer than astralum А (fig. 9) for the same reason as why astralum is richer than physicum: each astral object