Analysis of formation during evolution of those physiologic functions (and of respective morphological changes), which consist of several severely consecutive functional conversions (for example the blood coagulation consists of 11 of such conversions – biochemical reactions), each of those is nonsensical/useless in isolation from the functional chain as a whole, from its final aim, shows [ 3f ] that evolution is not spontaneous/casual.
    Only physical processes occur spontaneously, submit to the second principle of thermodynamics, lead to increase of entropy, to destruction, to simplification of structure but not to its complication. A biological species evolves under the management of its aggregor, the mental principle of the species as a whole. This conclusion leads to necessity of correction/modification of two generally adopted statements made by C.R. Darwin (1809-82) and V.I. Vernadsky (В.И. Вернадский, 1863-1945):
    3.7.1. Evolution of a species, its development, complication occurs not so much under control of Darwinian natural selection, as rather under (primary) managing influence of its (species) aggregor. The natural selection, which lasts to be considered as a formative factor of evolution in spite of severely reasoned critics of this thesis (for example, by Л.С. Берг/L.S. Berg, 1922), serves only passive (auxiliary) role by dint of cutting unsuccessful evolution branches off.
    3.7.2. The statement/thesis by V.I. Vernadsky of transition of biosphere into noosphere [at some stage ( ! ) of its evolution] ought to be inverted: it is NOT biosphere (totality of species) that develops, complicates it itself, BUT noosphere (which is just the totality of aggregors), existing primordially/initially ( ! ), reveals itself as biosphere (generating and developing it) incarnating itself into physicum, running/directing/controlling evolution/phylogenesis.
  And at last, the third, in principle new clarity into notion of heredity mechanisms which concerns immediately to phenomenon of reincarnation::
    3.7.3. two hereditary mechanisms works simultaneously (conjecturally - mutually independently)
• physical material (genetic, base, background one, bearing the hereditary information of the species) is transmitted from the parents (more widely: from ancestry),
• metaphysical material (individual, additional to the base one, bearing the individual information) is transmitted (can be transmitted) from the precarnatee.
    This thesis is close to the idea by J.B. Lamarck (1744-1829) about inheritanceof acquired (during the life-time) body traits, nevertheless with an important/principle distinguish: acquired traits are inherited not by physical way (from perents) but by metaphysical one (from precarnatee).

    Находки д-ра Стивенсона ценны, уникальны по такому показателю, как быстрота реинкарнации (за время значительно менее периода смены одного поколения), что и позволило д-ру Стивенсону найти массу живых свидетелей и официальных свидетельств конкретных событий жизни прекарнантов, но они отнюдь не уникальны по своей сути. Скорее напротив. Скорее каждый человек несет в себе (скрытые до поры) как груз травм прежних воплощений (включая физические травмы), так и арсенал/инвентарь приобретенных тогда умений (проявляющихся врожденными склонностями и дарованиями).
    Мощной поддержкой этого предположения являются наблюдения Р. Монро, который входил в активное взаимное общение как с умершими, с которыми он был знаком при их жизни, так и с незнакомыми.
    Таким образом, весьма высока вероятность того, что смерть не освобождает виновника от его вины, и что, следовательно, альтруизм предпочтительнее/вы-годнее эгоизма. Тем не менее, практика, повседневная практика показывает, как сильны тенденции эгоизма.   и