Knowledges of TAS about memory are not quite adequate, they are one-sided and limited, in spite of the volume immensity of (scientific) publications about it. TAS knows how to train, to improve memory; TAS distinguishes sets of memory kinds – the short- and long-time memory; the motor, emotional, logic, eidetic memory, etc. – but TAS does not know WHAT memory is, what kind of nature it is.
TAS represents memory as reproduction or repeated obtaining of information on the own – and only (!) own – experience, about the own – and only own – former thoughts, emotions, life events.
Meanwhile a good soothsayer can remind to her client that facts, which he cannot recollect by himself. So also a healer-diagnostician [ a3 ] can tell to his patient, that his problems are connected (to some extent) with a former, for example, trauma. But the patient objects: he does not remember such a trauma, so he considers, the healer is mistaken. And only when the healer starts to list one circumstances of this event after another, only then the patient suddenly and with surprise recollects it, and only then he agrees.
Moreover, TAS does not know at all, what INFORMATION is.